Court-ready expert reports, affidavits, and intelligence exhibits aligned to English, Swiss, and New York civil procedure. Chain-of-custody logs, source-tier citations, and expert-testimony availability.
An advanced intelligence report is the delivered output of an investigative engagement, built to the evidentiary standard of the retaining jurisdiction. It is not a narrative summary or a collection of annexes. It is a structured document with an executive summary, a findings register, a source-tier citation for every material assertion, a chain-of-custody ledger, and a witness-availability statement from the lead analyst.
Coldstorm's reports are aligned to English (CPR Part 35), Swiss (ZPO Art. 183 and following), and New York (CPLR § 3122 and related) civil procedure by default. Reports intended for other jurisdictions, including Canada (FCR Rule 52), the EU's cross-border regimes under Brussels Ia, and the UAE's ADGM/DIFC systems, are produced on instruction with the appropriate procedural alignment.
Every report is built during the engagement, not after. Findings are hashed as they are captured. Second-analyst review checkpoints at 33%, 66%, and pre-delivery are logged. Counsel receives a report that has already survived two rounds of internal challenge before it reaches them, with full documentation of what was reviewed, rejected, and retained.
Civil fraud, matrimonial recovery, insolvency, and commercial-dispute matters requiring expert intelligence evidence.
Investor-state, commercial, and enforcement arbitration where structured intelligence evidence is admitted.
Regulatory and criminal-enforcement referrals requiring structured intelligence packages.
Internal investigations requiring external expert analysis for audit committee or board presentation.
Evidence packages supporting civil actions by or against UHNW principals.
High-value claims where structured intelligence evidence supports coverage or defence positions.
Retaining jurisdiction confirmed. Civil procedure requirements identified (CPR, ZPO, CPLR, or equivalent). Report template and appendix structure defined. Expert-witness requirements clarified.
Every retrieval hashed and timestamped at the moment of capture. Analyst-query log running continuously. Second-analyst verification at 33% and 66% milestones.
Material assertions registered with source-tier citation, evidentiary weight, and confidence band. Findings that cannot anchor in Tier-1 or Tier-2 sources are explicitly flagged.
Lead analyst drafts report. Second-analyst challenge pass completed pre-delivery. Weak-evidence findings either reinforced or removed. Uncertainty explicitly disclosed.
Report delivered with chain-of-custody appendix, witness-availability statement, and optional analyst declaration. Available for cross-examination via remote or in-person deposition.
| Matter type | Scope profile | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Expert report for civil fraud | English CPR Part 35 | Delivered with final tracing report |
| Swiss ZPO-aligned exhibit | Swiss civil procedure | Delivered with tracing or EDD |
| New York CPLR-aligned exhibit | NY civil procedure | Delivered with tracing or EDD |
| Arbitration exhibit package | ICC, LCIA, SIAC, SCC | Includes exhibit + witness availability |
Every engagement is quoted after a confidential scoping call. Fees reflect matter complexity, jurisdictions in scope, and delivery timeline. Engagements instructed by counsel are treated as privileged work product and delivered to the retaining party only.
English (CPR Part 35), Swiss (ZPO), and New York (CPLR) civil procedure are the default alignments. Canadian (FCR), EU cross-border (Brussels Ia), ADGM/DIFC, and Singapore are available on instruction.
Yes. The lead analyst on every engagement is available for cross-examination, deposition, and declaration on request. Testimony terms and fees are agreed at engagement, separate from report-production fees.
Forensic accountants reconstruct financial flows. Our reports reconstruct structural and beneficial-ownership evidence that often precedes financial-flow analysis. The two frequently sit side-by-side in a single matter, with our report establishing the 'what is owned and by whom' and the accountant's establishing 'what moved and where.'
Yes, when instructed by counsel under privilege. The report is delivered to the retaining party only. Privilege posture is confirmed in the engagement letter.
Every material finding has a documented source-tier citation, a hashed retrieval record, and a confidence band. A challenge that succeeds typically identifies a finding we have already flagged as Tier-2 or Tier-3 supported. Findings anchored in Tier-1 evidence have survived cross-examination in every engagement to date.
Urgent matters receive a scoped response within twelve business hours. Longer engagements begin with a paid scoping consultation under privilege where counsel instructs.
Start Urgent Intake →